slot-reconcile engine: apply recipe drift to a provisioned slot; record declined drift #24
Labels
No labels
component:adapters
component:lifecycle
component:qa
component:setup
component:shared
component:worktrees
phase/accepted
phase/backlog
phase/deployed
phase/developing
phase/integrating
phase/planning
phase/qa
phase/requirements
phase/uat
priority:critical
priority:critical
priority:high
priority:high
priority:low
priority:low
priority:medium
priority:medium
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feature
type:infra
type:tech-debt
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
jbr870/devwork-skills#24
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Spawned from finding
F-PO-21-3-2(in-scope-deferrable) on issue #21 during /develop (auto-applied disposition, developer-decidable).Gap:
slot-isolation.md§5.5 defines reconcile as a first-class act andslot-claim.shpoints operators at it on drift, but noslot-reconcile.shengine ships in #21 — the operator procedure (git-worktrees/procedures/slot-lifecycle.md) documents the executable route instead (retire via worktree-cleanup + provision again), and a declined reconcile'sdrift.declined_atfield is read byslot-status.shbut written by nothing.Scope for this issue: a
slot-reconcile.shengine (recompute assignments from the current recipe, apply the delta axis-by-axis with the same resumable state machine, refuse destructive narrowing without --force) + recorddrift.declined_aton an explicit decline sostatuskeeps flagging it, + slot-flow.sh scenarios.This issue was deferred out of the parent feature's scope; it carries no PREQ yet. Run
/requirements --issue=<this>to flesh it out before planning.