meta-retrospective: no source-access resolution order — first run bulk-delegated to a busy peer session #32
Labels
No labels
component:adapters
component:lifecycle
component:qa
component:setup
component:shared
component:worktrees
phase/accepted
phase/backlog
phase/deployed
phase/developing
phase/integrating
phase/planning
phase/qa
phase/requirements
phase/uat
priority:critical
priority:critical
priority:high
priority:high
priority:low
priority:low
priority:medium
priority:medium
type:bug
type:chore
type:docs
type:feature
type:infra
type:tech-debt
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
jbr870/devwork-skills#32
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Observation
The first /meta-retrospective run (2026-08-13) requested bulk data gathering (a forge-wide learning scan + run reconstruction) from a live peer session that was mid-
/developon its own feature — before checking whether this box could do the work itself. It could: an authenticated glab made the whole drain ~6 read-only API calls locally. The peer rightly deferred, but absent a withdrawal it would have spent its release-session context later on work that was already done. The only irreplaceable thing the peer contributed was its first-hand observation of a same-day friction — which cost it one message.Operator feedback (2026-08-13): don't let another session spend its context on work this session can do.
Recurrence
Mechanical-adjacent: first run of the skill, direct operator correction. The skill text currently says to drain each source project "from inside that project's checkout" and is silent on how to resolve access when there is no local checkout — which is exactly where the misjudgment happened.
Hypothesis
Add a source-access resolution order to meta-retrospective's Inputs section: local checkout → local authenticated read-only forge CLI (meta-lane exemption, reads only — mutations still require the helpers) → a fresh dedicated agent on the remote box → a live working session LAST, and then only for what only it has (first-hand observations), never bulk gathering. Withdraw standing requests once satisfied.
Suggested lane
meta-amend (one subsection in meta-retrospective/SKILL.md).
Outcome — amended (commit
96f957a)Added a "Source-access resolution order" subsection to meta-retrospective/SKILL.md Inputs: local checkout → local authenticated read-only forge CLI (checked before asking anyone; reads sanctioned as meta-lane exemption, mutations still helper-only) → fresh dedicated agent on the remote box → live working session last, restricted to first-hand observations, with explicit withdrawal once satisfied.
Gate: lint-conventions clean. Desk-check against the originating scenario: with this text, the first run would have checked
glab auth statusat step 2 and never messaged the release session for the drain; the one legitimate ask (the session's own same-day observation) still lands on rung 4. The standing request to verity-release was withdrawn today before it spent context on it.Validates next real retrospective run.