Correcting deliverables (sreq:v1, qa-report:v1, test-plan:v1). #418

New issue

Open

opened 2026-08-26 16:20:17 +00:00 by jbr870 · 0 comments

jbr870 commented

2026-08-26 16:20:17 +00:00

Owner

Spawned from finding F-PO-45-2-2 (out-of-scope) on issue #45 during decision D-PO-45-2-2.

Original scope note: Flagged as out of scope in the approved PREQ — these are already mutable/latest-wins, and the recorded incident's SREQ recovered on its own.

Disposition rationale: Deliverable correction is already solved — sreq:v1, test-plan:v1 and qa-report:v1 are mutable/latest-wins, and the recorded feature-230 incident's SREQ recovered on its own, which is precisely the contrast that made the Phase Outcome's lack of a path visible. The stub therefore tracks a settled boundary rather than open work: it is the durable record of why deliverables were deliberately left out of the supersede design, so a later reader does not re-propose extending supersede to cover them. Resolved under the operator's standing instruction of 2026-08-26 ("resolve all decisions as recommended"), which is the authority for taking each producer recommendation as given.

This issue was deferred out of the parent feature's scope; it carries no PREQ yet. Run /dev:requirements --issue={new-number} to flesh it out before planning.

Spawned from finding `F-PO-45-2-2` (out-of-scope) on issue #45 during decision D-PO-45-2-2. **Original scope note:** Flagged as out of scope in the approved PREQ — these are already mutable/latest-wins, and the recorded incident's SREQ recovered on its own. **Disposition rationale:** Deliverable correction is already solved — `sreq:v1`, `test-plan:v1` and `qa-report:v1` are mutable/latest-wins, and the recorded feature-230 incident's SREQ recovered on its own, which is precisely the contrast that made the Phase Outcome's *lack* of a path visible. The stub therefore tracks a settled boundary rather than open work: it is the durable record of why deliverables were deliberately left out of the supersede design, so a later reader does not re-propose extending supersede to cover them. Resolved under the operator's standing instruction of 2026-08-26 ("resolve all decisions as recommended"), which is the authority for taking each producer recommendation as given. This issue was deferred out of the parent feature's scope; it carries no PREQ yet. Run `/dev:requirements --issue={new-number}` to flesh it out before planning.

jbr870 added the

labels

2026-08-26 16:20:17 +00:00

jbr870 referenced this issue

2026-08-26 16:20:18 +00:00

Phase Outcomes: no supersede path when a posted outcome's premise turns out false #45

jbr870 referenced this issue

2026-08-27 07:32:44 +00:00