Reconstructing outstanding claims after the driver itself dies mid-run #65

New issue

Open

opened 2026-08-25 10:43:32 +00:00 by jbr870 · 0 comments

jbr870 commented

2026-08-25 10:43:32 +00:00

Owner

Spawned from finding F-PO-43-2-3 (out-of-scope) on issue #43 during decision D-PO-43-2-3.

Original scope note: Flagged out of scope in the PREQ and independently raised as missing by the solution-architect review. Not filed anywhere yet and it is a real hole once claims exist: a resumed driver reads DISPATCH/RELEASE entries but nothing says who may reclaim an open claim or on what evidence. Recommend a follow-up issue.

Disposition rationale: Real hole independently raised by the solution-architect review and tracked nowhere: a resumed driver can read DISPATCH/RELEASE entries, but nothing defines who may reclaim an open claim or on what evidence — recovery semantics that must stay consistent with the operator's positive-death-check rule and deserve their own requirements round.

This issue was deferred out of the parent feature's scope; it carries no PREQ yet. Run /dev:requirements --issue=<this> to flesh it out before planning.

Spawned from finding `F-PO-43-2-3` (out-of-scope) on issue #43 during decision D-PO-43-2-3. **Original scope note:** Flagged out of scope in the PREQ and independently raised as missing by the solution-architect review. Not filed anywhere yet and it is a real hole once claims exist: a resumed driver reads DISPATCH/RELEASE entries but nothing says who may reclaim an open claim or on what evidence. Recommend a follow-up issue. **Disposition rationale:** Real hole independently raised by the solution-architect review and tracked nowhere: a resumed driver can read DISPATCH/RELEASE entries, but nothing defines who may reclaim an open claim or on what evidence — recovery semantics that must stay consistent with the operator's positive-death-check rule and deserve their own requirements round. This issue was deferred out of the parent feature's scope; it carries no PREQ yet. Run `/dev:requirements --issue=<this>` to flesh it out before planning.

jbr870 added the

labels

2026-08-25 10:43:32 +00:00

jbr870 referenced this issue

2026-08-25 10:43:32 +00:00

QA: intra-run lane-ownership primitive, plus a void-vs-flaky triage rule #43

jbr870 referenced this issue

2026-08-25 14:33:54 +00:00